FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|6 Months Ended|
Jun. 30, 2015
|Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]|
|FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
We sometimes limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by entering into interest rate swap or cap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements moderate our exposure to interest rate risk by effectively converting the interest on variable rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest rate cap agreements effectively limit our exposure to interest rate risk by providing a ceiling on the underlying variable interest rate. Our interest rate cap agreements are not material to our financial position and results of operations.
We measure our interest rate swap derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis. Information regarding our interest rate swaps measured at fair value, which are classified within Level 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy, is presented below (dollars in thousands):
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had outstanding interest rate swaps with aggregate notional amounts of $125.0 million designated as cash flow hedges. As of June 30, 2015, these swaps had a weighted average remaining term of 2.8 years. The fair value of these swaps designated as hedges are presented within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our balance sheets, and we recognize any changes in the fair value as an adjustment of accumulated other comprehensive loss within equity to the extent of their effectiveness. If the forward rates at June 30, 2015 remain constant, we estimate that during the next 12 months, we would reclassify into earnings approximately $1.3 million of the unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. If market interest rates increase above the 1.42% weighted average fixed rate under these interest rate swaps we will benefit from net cash payments due to us from our counterparty to the interest rate swaps.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $7.5 million and $7.6 million, respectively, that was not designated as a cash flow hedge. As of June 30, 2015, this swap had a remaining term of 6.6 years. The fair value of this swap is presented within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our balance sheets, and we recognize any changes in the fair value as an adjustment of interest expense. If market interest rates increase above the 2.28% fixed rate under this interest rate swap we will benefit from net cash payments due to us from our counterparty to the interest rate swap.
There were no transfers between levels during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. For financial assets and liabilities that utilize Level 2 inputs, the Company utilizes both direct and indirect observable price quotes, including LIBOR yield curves. The Company uses valuation techniques for Level 2 financial assets and liabilities which include LIBOR yield curves at the reporting date as well as assessing counterparty credit risk. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company's derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and the counterparties. As of June 30, 2015, the Company determined that the effect of credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. Therefore, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations are appropriately classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Disclosures
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities reflected in the balance sheets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximate fair value due to the short term nature of these financial assets and liabilities. The carrying value of variable rate debt financing reflected in the balance sheets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 approximates fair value as the changes in their associated interest rates reflect the current market and credit risk is similar to when the loans were originally obtained.
The fair values of fixed rate mortgages were estimated using the discounted estimated future cash payments to be made on such debt; the discount rates used approximated current market rates for loans, or groups of loans, with similar maturities and credit quality (categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy). The combined carrying value of our fixed rate mortgages payable was approximately $182.3 million as of June 30, 2015 with a fair value of approximately $187.7 million. In determining the fair value, the Company estimated a weighted average market interest rate of approximately 3.53%, compared to the weighted average contractual interest rate of 5.10%. The combined carrying value of our fixed rate mortgages was approximately $153.4 million as of December 31, 2014 with a fair value of approximately $158.3 million. In determining the fair value as of December 31, 2014, the Company estimated a weighted average market interest rate of approximately 3.59%, compared to the weighted average contractual interest rate of 5.11%.
The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef